Community Development and Revitalization
The vitality of every neighborhood determines the health of the entire city. This objective provides strategies to support and improve Kansas City’s neighborhoods, empower them to build capacity and partnerships, and revitalize distressed and abandoned areas. For successful implementation, government, businesses, neighborhood organizations, and residents need to take on individual and collective efforts to continually improve our neighborhoods.
The most direct, effective change in a community often comes from the people most affected by community development. That’s why a major goal of this objective is to empower communities to identify and address issues more efficiently, through community organizing, engagement and capacity building. Besides empowering neighborhoods directly, the plan aims to foster cooperation between neighborhood organizations and community anchors to form powerful partnerships that can contribute more to the community than either could alone. A community anchor is an organization (or person) that contributes to the identity, stability, and growth of specific neighborhoods or the community at large.
The Playbook also provides strategies to improve community outreach and engagement, by disseminating information, maintaining community dialogue, and increasing neighborhood participation in decision making. An important step of this is a neighborhood self-assessment process to help target city services and provide a strategic path forward for neighborhoods and partners. These initiatives will promote resident engagement and faster, more comprehensive action by the city and neighborhood groups.
This Objective also outlines strategies to revitalize distressed neighborhoods and reuse or redevelop abandoned properties and brownfields. This involves identifying and prioritizing areas that need to be targeted for revitalization, then creating strategic revitalization plans that identify the steps needed to attract new investment (while avoiding displacement). The city should track and use data to help identify areas most in need of revitalization. Data and metrics also can measure how well that revitalization works.
Additionally, the city should make its decision-making process transparent by developing a set of evaluation criteria to rank public investment opportunities. The criteria should apply to a range of public improvements and investments and grade them based on their equity impacts and how well they align with the Playbook’s Goals. This grading system will allow the city to prioritize projects that can have the greatest positive impact on communities in need.
A grassroots system for enacting change will ensure community-level problems are addressed in a way that is tailored to their specific needs. Empowerment, partnerships, and thoughtful revitalization will bring positive change to the many diverse communities of Kansas City.
INDICATORS OF SUCCESS |
If this Objective is successfully implemented, neighborhoods will have deeper awareness of their needs and improved ability to take on initiatives. Residents will have improved access to community problem-solving resources, and more investment and partnerships to revitalize and strengthen their neighborhood’s positive character. Community members and stakeholders citywide will be more active and empowered in their communities, resulting in more equitable local decision making. |
BENEFITS |
- Improved community-oriented problem solving
- Empowered residents and opportunities for public collaboration
- Partnerships that increase the reach and impact of individual organizations
- Enhanced quality and density of housing
- Equitable allocation of funds for distressed neighborhoods
- Fewer continuously distressed areas
- Fewer contaminated sites and lower exposure to contaminants for residents
- Increased reuse of vacant and brownfield sites for new development
CONTEXT |
Creating a more equitable Kansas City requires planned and inclusive investment in historically disadvantaged and neglected parts of the city. Kansas City’s Market Value Analysis (MVA) tool, Land Bank, brownfields program, development code, and network of supporting institutions all support revitalization of built-out areas in need of more investment.
For more context, please click HERE.
MEASURES OF SUCCESS |
|
KEY CONCEPTS |
Empowering neighborhoods |
To become empowered, neighborhoods must be the ones to identify the issues they face and help form strategies to address them. Expanded, improved community outreach and engagement can achieve this, especially outreach to people who are typically not engaged or are hard to reach. A neighborhood self-assessment process and area plan updates will identify strategic actions for neighborhoods and partners. Local government and community partners must work with neighborhood organizations and groups and homeowners’ associations to increase neighborhoods’ capacity to take on initiatives that improve the welfare of their communities. Creating a set of criteria to evaluate public improvements will lend transparency to this objective. By evaluating all public improvement projects with the same set of criteria, the city can highlight which projects best advance equity and the Playbook’s Goals. Expanding this evaluation system so it covers all public improvement projects, financial incentives, and subsidies would deliver more transparency and accountability in community development. The city must broaden access to programs and information so neighborhoods have the best opportunity possible to develop and engage in the economy and city life. The physical environment should be designed to strengthen social connections for people of all ages and physical abilities to combat the tendency toward isolation (see also the Connected City Objective). The city should expand neighborhoods’ access to environmental data to better understand the threat of climate change to their community and to engage in planning processes to mitigate the impacts. Related to that, the city also should continue efforts to eliminate the digital divide. That means working with the Kansas City Coalition for Digital Inclusion and other partners to identify and implement strategies to improve digital access (see the Smart City Technology and Trends Objective). |
Building capacity through partnerships |
Strong neighborhood organizations can achieve a lot, but some initiatives will be beyond the ability of neighborhoods alone. For successful community development, neighborhoods need partnerships to help them reach their goals. These partners are often community anchors – major institutions such as hospitals, colleges, faith-based organizations, community development corporations, and businesses – that work with neighborhoods to implement neighborhood improvements and activities. A neighborhood self-assessment or strategic planning process can help neighborhoods identify initiatives and the partners they need to accomplish them. Assistance could mean providing meeting spaces, youth and senior activities, special services and discounts, employment training, or physical reinvestment in the area. Partners also can be individuals and families with a special interest, skill, or ability to help their neighborhoods. The city should identify partners, and engage and support them, so they can contribute to the stability, identity, and growth of neighborhoods and the larger community. |
Revitalize distressed and abandoned areas |
In Kansas City, there is a tremendous opportunity to rehabilitate and reactivate unused sites that previously contained buildings. Many urban neighborhoods have seen major reinvestment and rehabilitation in recent decades and now are thriving. But other neighborhoods are still experiencing the effects of disinvestment. Even in distressed neighborhoods, however, buildings have historically been constructed with quality materials, which means there are opportunities for rehabilitation. Rehabilitated structures and infill development support valuable older neighborhoods. The city needs a thoughtful, coordinated, and comprehensive approach to reinforce, reaffirm, and rebuild these areas. The city also must put people first when it comes to code compliance, favoring effective problem solving over punitive measures. |
Reduce contamination through brownfield programs |
Brownfields are vacant or underused properties where reuse or redevelopment is complicated by the presence, or perception, of contamination. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides funding, tools, and technical assistance to help communities identify, clean up, and reuse brownfields to help revitalize communities. This is especially important for people affected by environmental injustice. Kansas City has operated an effective brownfields program for more than 25 years, successfully cleaning up properties to help renew neighborhoods and industrial areas. The most common contaminants are lead from paints and fuels, asbestos, underground fuel tanks, solvents from dry cleaners, and other commercial and light industrial chemicals. The continuing efforts of the city’s brownfield program are vital to Kansas City’s environmental health and to revitalizing communities that have been disproportionately impacted by harmful uses. |
COMMUNITY SUPPORTED ACTIONS (CSAs) |
Empowering neighborhoods | |
CD-1 | Continue to explore new techniques and technologies to improve public outreach and engagement and to improve resident and neighborhood involvement in all decision-making processes. Emphasize outreach to areas, persons, and community groups who are typically less engaged and/or hard to reach by utilizing alternative outreach and engagement strategies. |
CD-2 | Create and improve mechanisms to allow neighborhoods to share information with each other to communicate with city staff and elected officials. Create and improve mechanisms to allow neighborhoods to learn about city processes, legislation, services, and online data and mapping tools through programs like the city’s Citizen Engagement University. |
CD-3 | Continue to improve resident access to online data and mapping, including zoning, land use, development cases, census data, ownership, permits, city meeting schedules and agendas, code enforcement information, city polices and plans, and other information. |
CD-4 | Identify areas without a neighborhood organization and proactively work to increase the number of neighborhood organizations and their effectiveness. |
CD-5 | Create and promote a comprehensive service directory for neighborhoods that contains all programs provided by the city and other providers that are related to housing and neighborhood improvement. Work with regional partners to provide additional information from counties, MARC, and the state. |
CD-6 | Encourage volunteer activities for community cleanups, vacant lot upkeep, block watching, etc. |
CD-7 | Guide neighborhoods through a strategic self-assessment process and incorporate revitalization plans into the relevant area plan. During neighborhood strategic self-assessment processes and area plan updates, develop neighborhood strategies to improve and stabilize neighborhoods. The strategic self-assessment process will include the following:
|
CD-8 | Create a standardized set of public improvement evaluation criteria based on Playbook goals and objectives (consider using the Goal Supporting Criteria). Use these evaluation criteria to prioritize funding decisions. |
Building capacity through partnerships | |
CD-9 | Facilitate partnerships among community groups and between community groups and businesses or other organizations (also known as community anchors). Proactively identify community anchors and help forge partnerships in areas where there are none or too few. |
CD-10 | Develop a program to identify, recognize, and reward community anchors that make a significant positive impact. |
CD-11 | During neighborhood self-assessments, area plan updates, and implementation processes identify community anchors and other partners who could help with implementing community strategies. |
CD-12 | Partner with community development corporations (CDCs) in improving neighborhoods. Identify and expand roles for CDCs beyond new housing and housing rehabilitation, to include other needs relating to the vitality of neighborhoods and to the needs of people. |
Revitalize distressed and abandoned areas | |
CD-13 | Identify priority areas to target for revitalization.
|
CD-14 | Target public improvements (particularly basic infrastructure) and city services to support community development and revitalization efforts. |
CD-15 | Continue initiatives to inventory, deconstruct, salvage, or rehabilitate the city’s baseline dangerous buildings. |
CD-16 | Provide ongoing monitoring of neighborhood health to ensure problems do not worsen and to measure improvement.
|
CD-17 | Continue to explore improvements to code compliance, housing rehabilitation, and preservation of historic resources. Emphasize collaboration, community engagement, and problem solving in code compliance. Explore a proactive and systemic approach to code compliance in areas targeted for revitalization, including areas targeted in the Five-Year Consolidated Plan. |
CD-18 | Make home repair and renovation information and resources readily available, particularly in areas where code compliance issues are prominent. |
CD-19 | Improve enforcement and compliance with existing rental property registration requirements. |
CD-20 | Increase opportunities for neighborhood cleanups. Engage with community leaders and use 311 and other data sources to identify major illegal dumping sites and strategies to deter dumping. |
CD-21 | Continue to explore legislation and other initiatives to provide the city and local neighborhoods with more say in the future of vacant properties. |
CD-22 | Create and adopt a comprehensive Vacant Lot Strategy for the city and identify specific target areas and strategies during area plan updates.
|
Reduce contamination through brownfield programs | |
CD-23 | Continue to secure and utilize brownfield rehabilitation resources to address suspected contamination, support renovation of existing and historic structures, and prepare sites intended for new investment and reuse. |
CD-24 | Educate neighborhood leaders, non-profits and other stakeholders about available brownfield funding and opportunities from the EPA and the city. |
CD-25 | Develop a process to ensure that the city, area stakeholders, and developers address brownfields questions and discussion early in the revitalization planning process as the time needed for investigation, cleanup, and securing grants can be quite lengthy. |
CD-26 | Maintain and strengthen brownfields-related partnerships with the EPA, the State of Missouri, and with regional partners (Jackson County, Mid-America Regional Council, and the Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, KS) to better assist communities in need of revitalization. |
CD-27 | Utilize brownfield resources and tools to support neighborhood and community revitalization. Brownfields should be integrated into many related community development efforts, including: the Comprehensive Vacant Lot Strategy, neighborhood revitalization plans, capacity building, community engagement, environmental justice efforts, urban gardening and agriculture, public health and lead poisoning prevention, habitat restoration, the Climate Protection and Resiliency Plan, and more. |
RELATED LINKS |
|
|
Related Plans and Policies |